Planet

International Arrest Warrant and INTERPOL Notices

Facing an international arrest warrant or an Interpol notice isn’t your ordinary legal formality. It’s a direct threat to your reputation, freedom, and livelihood. For requested persons, it can lead to severe consequences like detention, extradition proceedings, visa denials, and travel restrictions. For businesses, the fallout can include executives facing arrests, frozen transactions, disputed cross-border operations, and trust issues.
The danger is compounded by the fact that these warrants and notices aren’t always issued for fair or lawful reasons. Political motivations, commercial rivalries, or investigative errors can turn INTERPOL’s system into a tool that targets innocent people and legitimate businesses. Many only discover the problem when the damage is already unfolding, such as border arrests, cancelled contracts, or sudden reputational crises.

Contact an Interpol lawyer!

The good news is that both individuals and companies have the right to challenge international arrest warrants and INTERPOL Notices. Our skilled International lawyers can request access to the data held against you, expose procedural violations, and file for deletion or correction through INTERPOL’s Commission for the Control of Files (CCF). For organizations, legal strategies can also include protecting executives, safeguarding operations, and restoring confidence among stakeholders.

We help you take control of your freedom and secure your professional or corporate reputation from lasting harm.

International Arrest Warrant — What Is It?

International arrest warrants serve as a legal instrument used to locate, arrest, and extradite individuals accused or convicted of committing crimes outside the country that issued the warrant. It is a key mechanism in the system of international legal cooperation aimed at combating crime. However, it’s not a direct authorization for the arrest or prosecution of the person sought in another country’s territory, but the basis for initiating extradition proceedings.

In international legal practice, an international arrest warrant serves as an official judicial or prosecutorial order of a state aimed at the arrest of a person abroad and his/her return to the country initiating the criminal prosecution. The warrant can be initiated by the executing judicial authority, public prosecutors or investigative bodies in the issuing state. In some cases, it may be initiated by an international organization, such as the International Criminal Court, the European Union, or in cooperation with INTERPOL.

After issuance, the warrant is transmitted to the relevant authorities of other countries through diplomatic channels, international organizations, or regional mechanisms. Fortunately, you can challenge an unlawful international arrest warrant and avoid lengthy extradition procedures, but you’ll need qualified legal support.

Our team of lawyers assists in matters related to international arrest warrants and INTERPOL notices, offering services such as assessing the legality of a warrant and preparing objections against extradition. We also help file complaints with the Commission for the Control of Files (CCF), protect clients’ rights during arrest abroad, and provide comprehensive support at all stages of the process.

Types of International Arrest Warrants

There are several types of international arrest warrants, each operating within a specific legal framework and carrying different legal consequences.

INTERPOL Red Notice

The Red Notice is an international alert issued by INTERPOL’s General Secretariat at the request of the executing member state to locate, arrest, or restrict the freedom of an individual before extradition. Although a Red Notice doesn’t have the legal status of an international arrest warrant, . That allows for arrests and extradition proceedings in many countries, and in some jurisdictions, it is equated with a national warrant.

The main consequences of a Red Notice include arrest at airports or borders, initiation of extradition, blocking of bank accounts, entry into immigration service databases, visa checks, and restrictions on international travel and activities. However, these international alerts are crucial for judicial cooperation among member states.

European Arrest Warrant (EAW)

The EAW is a judicial order issued by an EU member state for the arrest and transfer of an individual to another member country for prosecution or execution of a sentence. The EAW operates on the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in the European Union and replaces traditional extradition procedures.

The period of detention does not exceed 60 days after arrest. However, there are mandatory grounds for refusal to surrender, such as the requirement of dual criminality, protection of human rights, or the granting of special immunity.

International Criminal Court Warrant (ICC Warrant)

The ICC warrant is an official legal document issued by the International Criminal Court in The Hague. They facilitate the arrest of individuals accused of committing serious international crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. These arrest warrants are issued by ICC judges at the request of the prosecutor upon sufficient evidence of the suspect’s involvement.

States that have ratified the Rome Statute are obliged to cooperate, including arrest and transfer of the individual to The Hague. Non-ratifying states may refuse cooperation but face international pressure. Heads of state, senior military and civilian officials, commanders, and suspects involved in planning or committing grave international crimes may be subject to ICC warrants.

ICC warrants are public but may be kept secret until arrest in some cases.

Purpose and Legal Consequences of an International Arrest Warrant

An international arrest warrant is not used as a punitive tool but as a procedural mechanism facilitating criminal prosecution. A warrant enables a country to track and provisionally detain a person abroad, especially if the suspect has fled, changed citizenship, or left the country before the start of proceedings. After arrest, the warrant serves as the basis for extradition proceedings, and upon completion, the individual is transferred to the requesting country to take criminal responsibility.

Even before extradition or trial, an international warrant can significantly impact a person’s life. The main risk is temporary arrest at border crossings or when a notice triggers in INTERPOL’s system, such as a Red Notice. In many countries, lawful arrests occur automatically when the border control system signals.

After arrest, judicial proceedings begin, lasting from weeks to years. The individual may be held in custody or under strict supervision.

A warrant may also result in the freezing of bank accounts, seizure of assets, or restriction of access to financial tools, particularly in cases involving economic crimes, sanctions violations, or corruption. Even without a conviction, the existence of an international warrant can affect business reputation, employment, visa issuance, and compliance with KYC/AML procedures.

Stages of Issuance and Execution of an International Arrest Warrant

After issuing a national warrant, information is transmitted to international organizations. Law enforcement agencies of the state forward the data to the national INTERPOL office for the publication of a Red Notice, which is circulated among more than 195 INTERPOL member states.

For EU countries, the SIS II system is used. The judicial authority of one state may enter information into the SIS database, making it immediately available to other member states. The European Arrest Warrant applies automatically throughout EU member states and requires no confirmation by international bodies.

When the requested person crosses national borders or is located in an INTERPOL member state, the system automatically flags the Red Notice or EAW, and local authorities carry out the arrest according to the warrant.

Extradition proceedings begin once a person is detained. That involves judicial review of the warrant’s legality, assessment of dual criminality, and evaluation of grounds for refusal, such as political, humanitarian, or procedural reasons. If the court approves or the requested person consents to surrender, the individual is surrendered to the requesting country.

Grounds for Challenging an International Arrest Warrant

Based on the framework decision if these alerts, the judicial authority of the executing state may refuse an international warrant in the following cases:

  • Political motivation of criminal prosecution
    According to Article 3 of INTERPOL’s Constitution, the organization may not interfere in matters of a political, military, racial, or religious nature. A warrant may also lack a valid legal basis if issued during preliminary investigation without charges, violate the principle of double criminality, be time-barred, or breach proportionality.
  • Risk of torture and lack of fair trial
    If there is a threat of torture, inhuman treatment, or lack of fair judicial process in the requesting state, including cases based on religious or ethnic grounds, extradition is prohibited.
  • Abuse of INTERPOL’s system
    Some states use Red Notices as a pressure tool without actual arrest intentions, depriving individuals of travel, employment abroad, or access to banking, thereby affecting their reputation and the right to a fair trial.

How to challenge an International warrant or Interpol Notice

Challenging an international warrant requires knowledge of both international and domestic law, preparation of legal documents, and communication with international organizations. It also requires the collection of evidence, such as court decisions, human rights reports, or media information. A lawyer can help remove the notice, protect the client’s rights during extradition proceedings, and appeal or request a temporary suspension of extradition.

INTERPOL Operations: Notices and Communication Channels

INTERPOL is the world’s largest international police organization, coordinating law enforcement activities in 196 countries. Its main goal is assisting states in combating transnational crime. However, INTERPOL has no authority to arrest, investigate, or render judicial decisions. Its main tools are notices and the secure information exchange network used by member states to share data on criminals and crimes.

The process starts at the national level: law enforcement authorities (court, prosecutor, police) submit a request to the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL, which transmits it to the INTERPOL General Secretariat in Lyon, France. There, the request undergoes legal and procedural review to ensure compliance with INTERPOL’s Constitution and rules, particularly Article 3, which prohibits any intervention of a political, military, religious, or racial nature. If the request passes verification, INTERPOL circulates the information globally to all 196 member states through its secure communication system, I-24/7.

One of INTERPOL’s most visible tools is the system of notices, with the Red Notice being the most well-known. Contrary to popular belief, a Red Notice is not an international arrest warrant. Instead, it is a request to locate and provisionally detain a person pending extradition, surrender, or similar legal action, based on valid national arrest warrants. Other notices, such as Blue, Green, Yellow, or Black, serve different purposes, ranging from locating witnesses to identifying unidentified bodies.

It is crucial to understand that the decision to arrest or extradite remains solely with the national authorities of each member state. INTERPOL itself cannot compel police forces to detain an individual. Enforcement depends entirely on domestic legislation and bilateral or multilateral agreements between states.

Despite its important role in global security, the INTERPOL system is sometimes misused. Certain states exploit Red Notices or diffusions to pursue political opponents, business rivals, or dissidents abroad. To counteract such abuses, individuals have the right to challenge the publication of a notice by submitting a request to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF), an independent body that reviews cases and can order deletion of data that violates INTERPOL’s rules.

Thus, while INTERPOL provides an essential platform for international police cooperation, its mechanisms must be understood in their legal and practical limitations. For individuals facing Red Notices or other alerts, professional legal assistance is vital to protect their rights, prevent wrongful arrests, and secure deletion of abusive or unlawful notices.

Types of INTERPOL Notices

  • Red Notice: For the identification and arrest of the person named in a criminal offence with a view to extradition. While not a legal warrant, in practice it has an equivalent effect.
  • Blue Notice: To track the location or request additional information about a person without arrest.
  • Yellow Notice: For locating missing persons, especially children or individuals whose identity is unknown.
  • Green Notice: To notify other countries about a potential threat posed by a person, e.g., a repeat offender.
  • Orange Notice: Warning of specific threats, such as weapons, explosives, or attack methods.
  • Purple Notice: Information about methods, processes, and objects used in crimes, including transportation, routes, and means of communication.
  • Black Notice: Request for assistance in identifying deceased or unknown persons.
  • UN Special Notice: For individuals or entities subject to UN Security Council sanctions.

You can check whether a notice exists against your name via INTERPOL’s public database, using name, gender, age, nationality, and other details. If a notice exists, do not panic: being listed does not mean automatic guilt.

Consult a lawyer specializing in international law. The specialist can request full data from INTERPOL’s Commission for the Control of Files (CCF), assess the legality of the warrant, and, if necessary, file for its removal from the system.

Legal Assistance with International Arrest Warrants

Without specialist support, there is a high risk of mistakes in the process, which may complicate or even make defense impossible. A lawyer reviews the grounds of the warrant, the legality of its issuance, and the possibility of invoking international agreements:

  • Defense in arrest and extradition: representation in the arresting country’s court, preparation of objections to extradition, participation in hearings, and contact with authorized bodies.
  • Interaction with INTERPOL: request for database access, preparation and submission of applications to the CCF for notice deletion, and challenging Red Notices based on political motivation or human rights violations.
  • International legal support: advice on border crossing risks, assistance with visa issues, banking checks, and immigration procedures.

When choosing a specialist, consider their experience with international warrants, knowledge of extradition and international criminal law, partnerships in other countries (for coordinated defense in multiple jurisdictions), reputation, litigation history, and involvement in international public cases. A professional lawyer acts quickly and prevents escalation through timely motions, statements, and protective measures.

Contact us now to receive an initial consultation and develop a strategy for further action. Our team provides comprehensive services in cases related to international arrest warrants: analysis and contesting of INTERPOL notices, defense during extradition and arrest, filing applications to the CCF and international courts, and representation across jurisdictions through a reliable partner network.

Anatoly Yarovyi
Senior Partner, Attorney-at-law, admitted to the Bar (Certificate to practice Law #701 as of 28.12.2009)
Anatoly Yarovyi is a highly experienced lawyer with 20 years in the field, specializing in law enforcement, intelligence activities, International Public Law, and human rights. His current focus is on Interpol and Extradition cases, as well as advising high-profile clients on personal and business security, data protection, and freedom of movement. Anatoly’s diverse background includes roles in the Prosecutor’s Office, intelligence agencies, and top multinational law firms.

    Planet

    FAQ

    Can I challenge an INTERPOL notice?

    Yes, INTERPOL notices can and should be challenged if they violate the organization’s constitution. Complaints are submitted to INTERPOL’s Commission for the Control of Files (CCF), which has the authority to revoke a notice. Successful complaints require proper justification with supporting documents. It is recommended to seek help from a lawyer specializing in international law.

    Is a Red Notice an arrest warrant?

    No, a Red Notice does not carry the legal force of an international arrest warrant, but in practice, it is often used as grounds for temporary detention. Its purpose is to inform the requesting state that the person is wanted for extradition preparation. Further actions, such as arrest or extradition, depend on the law of the country where the person resides.

    What should I do if an international arrest warrant is issued?

    If you’re aware of an international arrest warrant or an INTERPOL notice, you should immediately contact an international lawyer. The lawyer will help you review the warrant’s details, request access to INTERPOL, challenge the notice, and develop a defense strategy in case of arrest or extradition request.

    Can a country refuse to execute an arrest warrant?

    Yes, a country may refuse to execute an international arrest warrant if it has no extradition treaty or id certain conditions aren’t met. If due process was violated for political, humanitarian, or legal reasons (such as risk of torture, lack of fair trial, political nature of the case), or if the warrant does not meet the principle of “dual criminality” (i.e., the alleged offence is not a crime in the requested state). Some countries also refuse to extradite their own nationals to a foreign state for prosecution.

    How long does extradition under an international arrest warrant take?

    The time limits depend on jurisdiction, case complexity, and the resistance of the wanted person. On average, extradition takes from one month to one year. If appeals or complaints are filed with international bodies, the process may take several years. During this time, the person may be detained or restricted in freedom.

    Planet